3 ms·
But they aren't filling the article with useful facts or details. It's all intellectual popcorn. Mention that something big is coming up, then mention what th
by maxlybbert 11y ago
But they aren't filling the article with useful facts or details. It's all intellectual popcorn. Mention that something big is coming up, then mention what the main engineer ate for breakfast, then pause to lament the fact that people often skip breakfast, and finally reach your big reveal.
Then claim the fact that it rambles is proof of good writing.
- mcnamaratw 11y agoExactly. This particular article isn't providing much depth. It's mostly misdirection followed by a dramatic revelation of the generally-accepted answer. The dominant guess at the failure mode of that bridge has been flutter for a very long time. Anyone else who has gone through the mechanics and disagrees with me on this, please let me know your thinking.