4 ms·
On top of that, the cars can communicate more and faster than the drivers, and can be programmed to collaborate with the other vehicles. So you can have stuff l
by euyyn 11y ago
On top of that, the cars can communicate more and faster than the drivers, and can be programmed to collaborate with the other vehicles. So you can have stuff like the cars in a packed highway opening up a diagonal for a car in the left lane to take an exit on the right.
- grogenaut 11y agoI feel that will work only okay even if there is one car manufacturer, but get tthe differences between a lot of them, then throw in porsche and others programming in "advantages" and "agressive" as options and where do you end up?
- Retra 11y agoSomebody trying to develop a standardized AI road etiquette protocol?
- grogenaut 11y agoI'm just thinking about the level of coordination required and then you get into timings, and other issues where one car may respond slightly slower. I think stuff like this makes it way harder than people think. And that's without any bad or just not altruistic actors there. Think if the "Sport" package on your BMW was code for "talks the other cars into letting it go first. With peoples car, the person with the complete clunker wins that race as they obviously don't care if they hit you and don't have the money to pay you back. BMW has to back off. With software it's down to the negotiating powers of the cars software. We've seen how well that works in trading, no one ever games the laws slightly for their own advantage.
- sidthekid 11y agoMaybe the IEEE 802.11p standard would be used for this purpose.