They don't want to just organize. The city has laws which protect employees from being fired for attempting to unionize, but those laws don't apply to contracto

They don't want to just organize. The city has laws which protect employees from being fired for attempting to unionize, but those laws don't apply to contractors. They want the law to be changed to cover contractors so they can have that protection. That's my understanding of the situation, which is tenuous. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. It's mind-blowing, the amount of words written about this, yet there is no clear explanation of what exactly is going on.