3 ms·
Any representative government being overthrown by a militaristic dictator is justification for war. Please argue this. I don't see how I could disagree with th
by wildengineer 11y ago
Any representative government being overthrown by a militaristic dictator is justification for war.
Please argue this. I don't see how I could disagree with this, but here's your chance to convince me.
- golergka 11y ago> overthrown Have you seen Episodes 1-3? Palpatine has real support of the public. (Look, dude, of course he's evil as hell, I don't deny that. It's just that arguments that you choose to prove that are not working.)
- wildengineer 11y ago> Palpatine has real support of the public. They showed many planets at the end of RotJ [1] where massive celebrations occurred, including Coruscant. I think these celebrations speak to the rebellion's support. >It's just that arguments that you choose to prove that are not working. There's nothing to prove. The belief that a people have the right to topple their dictators is subjective. I can only prove something if we share the same axioms. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiM5zEEI_Jo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiM5zEEI_Jo
- dragonwriter 11y ago> They showed many planets at the end of RotJ [1] where massive celebrations occurred, including Coruscant. I think these celebrations speak to the rebellion's support. Not at the time the Empire was formed, though.
- golergka 11y ago> their dictators How do you define who's a dictator and who's not? If Winston Churchill have acquired more executional powers during WWII to get through mind-boggling beurocracy, would you call him dictator, for example? You're trying to prove a statement that is true, but your proof is abysmal.