4 ms·
Again, that's irrelevant. Privacy is the exercise of the right to one's personal agency. Everybody has the right to choose to whom they will expose their naked
by Zikes 11y ago
Again, that's irrelevant. Privacy is the exercise of the right to one's personal agency. Everybody has the right to choose to whom they will expose their naked self, and that's simply all there is to it. It's not about shame, ignoring, staring, self-consciousness, sexuality, or whatever other issues you're trying to conflate it with. It's simply a person's choice, which has entirely no negative effects on anyone else.
You've no right to demand to see anyone naked at any time, and I certainly hope you don't believe you would have that right. Why does putting a bunch of people of the same gender in a room and putting a sign on the door change that at all?
- venomsnake 11y agoOf course. But excising said right does not makes them immune from criticism. Especially when it has the added benefit of making the gym more expensive for everyone else.
- Zikes 11y agoCriticizing someone for exercising their right to privacy is not going to win you many friends. Also, a simple curtain is plenty. The article's talk about frosted glass pods are obviously a cherry-picked example intended to make millenials seem more absurd. It's simple capitalism, you very likely wouldn't see any change in your rates at all, and if you did then the gym down the street will undercut your gym with a "Strut Friendly" locker room.