2 ms·
ok, lets take a look at https://www.ampproject.org/ https://www.ampproject.org/ which is a valid amp document. page speed insights https://developers.googl
by franze 11y ago
ok, lets take a look at https://www.ampproject.org/ https://www.ampproject.org/ which is a valid amp document.
page speed insights
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ampproject.org%2F
mobile 68/100
desktop 59/100
webpagetest.org
https://www.webpagetest.org/result/151214_DW_X81/
first byte: 0.225s
start render: 0.816s
speed index: 3396
compare it to one of my sites where we did some speed optimization (wordpress based / responsive design)
page speed insights
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.veganblatt.com%2Fnatuerliche-antibiotika
mobile 71/100 (mostly thx to jquery)
desktop 90/100
page speed insights
https://www.webpagetest.org/result/151214_4T_X91/
first byte:0.145s
start render: 0.712s
speed index: 797
Amp is not per-se fast(er). But for this, they crippled HTML5, basically want us to forgo responsive design (responsive is not (only) about mobile), oh, and buy into another google dependency.
and why? just because publishers are too lazy to make sites fast, and too dependent on third party crap (ads & an unbelievable amount of other crap).
As a publisher and user, I hope Amp succeeds in disrupting the way publishers publish mobile.
As a developer: OMFG, they throw the baby out with the bathwater. (they = Google, baby = html5, bathwater = internet)