5 ms·
HN is hosted behind CloudFlare, too, so this should be as simple as flipping a switch...
by ejdyksen 11y ago
HN is hosted behind CloudFlare, too, so this should be as simple as flipping a switch...
- buro9 11y agoI've no direct knowledge at all into this, but... for my own forums I found that most of the comment spam tools I was using presumed IPv4. This was especially true of "spam from same network" type logic that these tools were using. For example only: Stop Forum Spam only recently began testing their work for IPv6: https://www.stopforumspam.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=44371 https://www.stopforumspam.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=44371 I re-wrote my comment spam solution (not specifically for the comment spam problem, was doing some other stuff) and have long since enabled IPv6, but it's worth bearing in mind that network is one thing, sometimes what holds someone back from flipping the switch are the tools we use.
- ejdyksen 11y agoCloudFlare does have a pretty compelling compatibility layer just for that purpose: https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/202494830-Pseudo-IPv4-Supporting-IPv6-addresses-in-legacy-IPv4-applications https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/202494830-P...
- buro9 11y agoThanks for letting me know :)
- samuellb 11y agoDoing blacklisting of IPv6 addresses is actually quite hard, because you can't know how network owners lay out their addresses. Some networks (especially VPS providers) will use one /64 (or so) per datacenter, while other will give out a /64 for individual users. So when 2001:db8:a1:b2::c:3 has sent spam to you, you can't know if you should block the network 2001:db8:a1:b2::/64 or the specific address 2001:db8:a1:b2::c:3. Some blacklists (carelessly) take the former approach and block entire datacenters.
- andrewpe 11y agoHonestly, if an entire datacenter is using a single /64 it sounds like they are doing something wrong. It's as easy to get a /48 with 65k individual /64 (one for each customer) as it is to get a single /64