4 ms·
I don't know man, I visit sometimes hundreds of sites a day, if I had to pay even $1/day to visit a site, I'd be paying hundreds of dollars a day. I'd rather vi
by Killswitch 11y ago
I don't know man, I visit sometimes hundreds of sites a day, if I had to pay even $1/day to visit a site, I'd be paying hundreds of dollars a day. I'd rather view an ad. I already pay out the ass for internet. I don't need to pay to view content on the internet too.
- paulddraper 11y ago"pay out the a" is an odd expression. It seems what you are paying isn't worth very much (i.e. a pile of worthless s)
- Killswitch 11y agoIt isn't. I pay $65/mo for "up to 50Mbps" internet. I am paying no less than $1.3/mo per Mbps.
- louhike 11y agoYou could pay for some websites and be limited by a paywall for the others. And the content on the internet has nothing to do with your ISP so I have somme difficulty understanding your argument "I don't need to pay to view content on the internet too.".
- Killswitch 11y agoMeaning, a paywall everywhere is not a smart thing to do. Yes I know content is independent of ISP, that's why I accept ads. Because that's how content producers afford to give you content without charging you.
- tbabb 11y agoThe value of your view is closer to 0.1 cents. So 100 web clicks a day would cost about a dime to remove ads.