3 ms·

i was just looking for a power bar and noticed all these 5-star reviews were done by users who received it for free: http://www.amazon.com/APC-C25B-Outlet-Savi

by modzu 11y ago

i was just looking for a power bar and noticed all these 5-star reviews were done by users who received it for free: http://www.amazon.com/APC-C25B-Outlet-Saving-Filter/product-reviews/B00NTJ2QRY/ref=cm_cr_dp_qt_see_all_top/187-2974287-1159157?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1&sortBy=byRankDescending http://www.amazon.com/APC-C25B-Outlet-Saving-Filter/product-... sketchy. its like back when google's ads looked just like search results

ruffrey 11y ago
It's an odd thing. Over the past year my wife has gotten a ton of stuff for free or near free. She just posts a review, indicating she was paid to do it (important). One example site is amzreviewtrader.com. It's so awesome to get so much stuff for free/cheap. However I'm not sure it is good for consumers. She is honest in her reviews. But you are evaluated for each item you request to review, and it would be easy for an unscrupulous reviewer to only post positive reviews to appear as a better candidate. At this point, it is so prevalent, maybe it's time for Amazon to offer something similar with tighter restrictions.
- wangarific 11y ago
  There are a lot of these sites that give you free or cheaply priced products in return for a review, the reviews help that product listing appear higher in the Amazon search listings. There's often no requirement to disclose you got the product for cheap or free. I suspect this is Amazon's way of policing it.
jasonlotito 11y ago
What does this have to do with the random page you linked to on Amazon?
modzu 11y ago
the point is that (1) the reviews are biased. even if the reviewer tries to be truthful, the fact that they received the item for free may impact their rating. the fact that at the few samples i checked, every rating was 5 stars, suggests as much to me. this is uncontroversial (cf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funding_bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funding_bias). this is separate from the issue that the reviewers themselves are "selected" (is this algorithm totally transparent? is it purely based on their helpfulness rating?) creating a biased pool of reviews as well (2) the reviews, despite having a subtitle indicating that they are part of the vine program, look and read in every other way like a normal review. it was not until i had read several reviews before i noticed the vine program disclaimer. also the star rating includes these vine reviews, which generally serve as an at-a-glance rating for an item. no doubt the intent is to make the origin of these reviews non-obvious to the casual observer. in other words, it is misleading. it may not be a new phenomenon, and surely it happens in other domains as well, but it is discouraging. it would be nice to see amazon set higher standards, perhaps separating paid from unpaid reviews more clearly. im glad at least that some people are benefiting from the free stuff ;)

by modzu 11y ago

ruffrey 11y ago

It's an odd thing. Over the past year my wife has gotten a ton of stuff for free or near free. She just posts a review, indicating she was paid to do it (important). One example site is amzreviewtrader.com. It's so awesome to get so much stuff for free/cheap. However I'm not sure it is good for consumers. She is honest in her reviews. But you are evaluated for each item you request to review, and it would be easy for an unscrupulous reviewer to only post positive reviews to appear as a better candidate. At this point, it is so prevalent, maybe it's time for Amazon to offer something similar with tighter restrictions.

wangarific 11y ago
There are a lot of these sites that give you free or cheaply priced products in return for a review, the reviews help that product listing appear higher in the Amazon search listings. There's often no requirement to disclose you got the product for cheap or free. I suspect this is Amazon's way of policing it.

jasonlotito 11y ago

What does this have to do with the random page you linked to on Amazon?

modzu 11y ago

the point is that (1) the reviews are biased. even if the reviewer tries to be truthful, the fact that they received the item for free may impact their rating. the fact that at the few samples i checked, every rating was 5 stars, suggests as much to me. this is uncontroversial (cf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funding_bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funding_bias). this is separate from the issue that the reviewers themselves are "selected" (is this algorithm totally transparent? is it purely based on their helpfulness rating?) creating a biased pool of reviews as well (2) the reviews, despite having a subtitle indicating that they are part of the vine program, look and read in every other way like a normal review. it was not until i had read several reviews before i noticed the vine program disclaimer. also the star rating includes these vine reviews, which generally serve as an at-a-glance rating for an item. no doubt the intent is to make the origin of these reviews non-obvious to the casual observer. in other words, it is misleading. it may not be a new phenomenon, and surely it happens in other domains as well, but it is discouraging. it would be nice to see amazon set higher standards, perhaps separating paid from unpaid reviews more clearly. im glad at least that some people are benefiting from the free stuff ;)