It's a classic moral dilemma (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem). If you knew 100 people would die thi

It's a classic moral dilemma (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem). If you knew 100 people would die this year but you could do something that would save them all at the expense of killing 50 other people, what would you do? The coldly logical choice is to "disregard individual rights in the name of overall efficiency" and prefer 50 deaths to 100, particularly if you're a government - isn't it?