So that implies that there is currently in force copyright protection for "industrially exploited artistic works" and that the change is to extend the period of

So that implies that there is currently in force copyright protection for "industrially exploited artistic works" and that the change is to extend the period of protection. Given that there is not currently an issue with needing a licence to include a protected object in a photo, I'd like to understand what other changes are coming to make this happen - or if Ars has misunderstood the issue.