> but this is one way in which their system is better than ours. That is ludicrous. > They have people in positions where they can do the math and decide that

> but this is one way in which their system is better than ours. That is ludicrous. > They have people in positions where they can do the math and decide that if some decision greatly saves lives on the net, they can enact it even if it directly causes (less) lives to be lost. What you mean to say is they have people in positions where they can enact it, for any number of reasons . . . Let's hope the decider guy isn't the air quality monitor for Beijing.