>it's not the right of ownership it's the right of enforcing a monopoly. Ownership is a form of monopoly as well. Just because a resource is rivalrous doesn't

>it's not the right of ownership it's the right of enforcing a monopoly. Ownership is a form of monopoly as well. Just because a resource is rivalrous doesn't mean more than one person couldn't be permitted to use it, particularly when you're talking about capital goods.