3 ms·
If that's giving up his name, then all the other Harmans on facebook had their name stolen by this particular Harman. A more accurate statement would be "clear
by philh 17y ago
If that's giving up his name, then all the other Harmans on facebook had their name stolen by this particular Harman.
A more accurate statement would be "clearly they think somebody not using one particular variant of their name as a facebook vanity URL is not a big deal". I would tend to agree.
- Tichy 17y agoThe other Harmans didn't have their name stolen - they were simply too late. If somebody not using a particular vanity URL is not a big deal, then why does Harman Inc need the URL anyway? Why don't they just go for /harmanInc or something like that? I am also not saying that it is that much of a big deal - not like they are supposed to odder millions. But to just offer worthless junk is offensive. Also I think "he needs it more than you, so it should belong to him" is not a good basis for conducting business.