I agree. Regardless of the outcome, I'm grabbing the popcorn. I'm half-waiting for another P2P foundation signed post discrediting him, too. Even if Craig Wrig

I agree. Regardless of the outcome, I'm grabbing the popcorn. I'm half-waiting for another P2P foundation signed post discrediting him, too. Even if Craig Wright is (wholly or part of) Nakamoto, I'm confused as to why it is he thinks it is a good idea to advertise the fact that he is some years later; whose benefit does it serve other than that of his own ego? This type of work could easily be the ramblings of a mad scientist who feels perpetually underappreciated, and is trying to latch onto this because he thinks he will finally get the worldwide recognition he feels he deserves. The easiest way for Wright or another to prove he is who he says he is is to simply sign a message using Nakamoto's keys. Since we still have no mathematical evidence, I personally will believe this is a hoax.