3 ms·
Bumping you back up because I don't think you're trying to be inflammatory... You're asking why the American government doesn't implement more progressive/libe
by icegreentea 11y ago
Bumping you back up because I don't think you're trying to be inflammatory...
You're asking why the American government doesn't implement more progressive/liberal labour laws and/or 'entitlements'?
The massive wall of reasons why American (I assume you're talking about American) labour benefits/protections are relatively minimal is a pretty good reason for why companies are "forced" to do paid mat/pat leave to compete.
- flavor8 11y agoYeah, obviously it's a touchy subject. And I understand the reality too; adding social benefits at the federal level would be a tough political fight that few of our politicians seem particularly keen or suited to take on.