5 ms·

> Finally, you don’t have to be a climate scientist to note that 1/3 of all emissions of CO2 have occurred since 1970 with no significant increase in global tem

> Finally, you don’t have to be a climate scientist to note that 1/3 of all emissions of CO2 have occurred since 1970 with no significant increase in global temperature. http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/File:Instrumental_Temperature_Record_png http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/File:Instrumental_Tempe... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record#/media/File:Global_Temperature_Anomaly.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record#/media/File...

vixen99 11y ago
http://wattsupwiththat.com/global-temperature/ http://wattsupwiththat.com/global-temperature/ All linked back to sources. E-mail messages obtained by a Freedom of Information Act request reveal that NASA concluded that its own climate findings were inferior to those maintained by both the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) — the scandalized source of the leaked Climate-gate e-mails — and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center. The e-mails from 2007 reveal that when a USA Today reporter asked if NASA’s data “was more accurate” than other climate-change data sets, NASA’s Dr. Reto A. Ruedy replied with an unequivocal no. He said “the National Climatic Data Center’s procedure of only using the best stations is more accurate,” admitting that some of his own procedures led to less accurate readings. “My recommendation to you is to continue using NCDC’s data for the U.S. means and [East Anglia] data for the global means,” Ruedy told the reporter.
- Oletros 11y ago
  What has to do your post with the OP's one? By the way, still talking about "climate gate". Doesn't have the people at whatsupp anything better to try to deny things?
- tonmoy 11y ago
  I don't understand what temperature anomaly means, could you please explain?
  - mcguire 11y ago
    It's a euphemism meaning "unexpected, outside normal variation, temperature change."
    - tonmoy 11y ago
      Huh, so the data in that link actually seems to agree with climate change
- Oletros 11y ago
  http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/03/31/ceis-horner-enlists-fox-news-in-manufacturing-a/162534 http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/03/31/ceis-horner-enli...

vixen99 11y ago

http://wattsupwiththat.com/global-temperature/ http://wattsupwiththat.com/global-temperature/ All linked back to sources. E-mail messages obtained by a Freedom of Information Act request reveal that NASA concluded that its own climate findings were inferior to those maintained by both the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) — the scandalized source of the leaked Climate-gate e-mails — and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center. The e-mails from 2007 reveal that when a USA Today reporter asked if NASA’s data “was more accurate” than other climate-change data sets, NASA’s Dr. Reto A. Ruedy replied with an unequivocal no. He said “the National Climatic Data Center’s procedure of only using the best stations is more accurate,” admitting that some of his own procedures led to less accurate readings. “My recommendation to you is to continue using NCDC’s data for the U.S. means and [East Anglia] data for the global means,” Ruedy told the reporter.

Oletros 11y ago
What has to do your post with the OP's one? By the way, still talking about "climate gate". Doesn't have the people at whatsupp anything better to try to deny things?
tonmoy 11y ago
I don't understand what temperature anomaly means, could you please explain?
- mcguire 11y ago
  It's a euphemism meaning "unexpected, outside normal variation, temperature change."
  - tonmoy 11y ago
    Huh, so the data in that link actually seems to agree with climate change
Oletros 11y ago
http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/03/31/ceis-horner-enlists-fox-news-in-manufacturing-a/162534 http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/03/31/ceis-horner-enli...