> Here it's clear that xfs gives better results, with the average write beating all ext4 modes by a few hundred microseconds. Am I wrong that the graph above t

> Here it's clear that xfs gives better results, with the average write beating all ext4 modes by a few hundred microseconds. Am I wrong that the graph above that statement does not show that? While it shows xfs having better latency than ext4, the axis is labelled as "write latency nanoseconds", and the difference between ext4 and xfs is ~400ns, or .4µs; not "a few hundred microseconds."