5 ms·
That's a pretty ridiculous ad hominem. You don't seem to even try to engage with the substance of what she's saying.
by conistonwater 11y ago
That's a pretty ridiculous ad hominem. You don't seem to even try to engage with the substance of what she's saying.
- osipov 11y agoNonsense. My entire argument is about her writing and how it was shaped by her childhood experiences.
- smikhanov 11y agoWhile being factually true, that's an incredibly shallow view of her work. It's the same as linking all your sexual preferences to (un)resolved Oedipus complex from your childhood -- it's most likely to be true, but doesn't give you any useful insight into the subject matter.
- osipov 11y ago>“my politics are closest to that of The Economist newspaper: mildly Libertarian, fiscally conservative, socially liberal where it’s practical and pragmatic, cautiously globalist”. now everything falls into place: just like The Economist you are also virulently Russophobic
- smikhanov 11y agoIt looks like we're talking about different magazines called The Economist, but I appreciate your interest anyways.