4 ms·
I agree in principle for most products, no QA, no testing. Why? * Everyone should do QA and implement their features own UI/UX, by following the pattern the ap
by whistlerbrk 11y ago
I agree in principle for most products, no QA, no testing. Why?
* Everyone should do QA and implement their features own UI/UX, by following the pattern the application and framework sets tuned by an actual designer
* An environment where production issues and bugs are prioritized above everything else should be created and fostered
* To paraphrase Rich Hickey's analogy on the matter: writing tests is like driving around relying on the guard rails to keep you in the lines. That is (my interpretation):
* If your code is this fragile to constantly require testing you've chosen poor abstractions.