I don't think the author understands SemVer based on them raising the point of "major vs minor" arguments. 1. What argument over Major vs Minor? Major makes in

I don't think the author understands SemVer based on them raising the point of "major vs minor" arguments. 1. What argument over Major vs Minor? Major makes incompatible API changes. Minor adds backwards-compatible functionality. Patches are bug fixes that do not add functionality. So taking 2.3.13 as an example. Since the release of 1.0.0 there has been 1 major change that required changes to the API that were incompatible with the old API causing the version to rise to 2.0.0. There have been 3 minor changes on the 2.0 Version that have added backwards-compatible (to 2.0.0) functionality. There have been 13 patches that have fixed bugs since version 2.0.0 was released. Where is the confusion? What is there to argue over?