3 ms·
Totally buy they could reduce actual errors that matter. I've worked with many a QA who would get bent up over a detail outside of the spec that didn't really
by TheAndruu 11y ago
Totally buy they could reduce actual errors that matter.
I've worked with many a QA who would get bent up over a detail outside of the spec that didn't really matter, and where all QA testing was manual.
Coders (good ones) are well equipped to automate processes, and to do so quickly, and this extends to integration testing.
- noarchy 11y ago>I've worked with many a QA who would get bent up over a detail outside of the spec that didn't really matter, and where all QA testing was manual. This is where you need management (or someone from the product side) who can set priorities, where needed, and put and end to pointless side-disputes that can and do crop up.