3 ms·
The difference is that Mozilla could make installing a H.264 decoder plug-in from some third party source on the first occasion the browser meets a H.264 video
by DrJokepu 17y ago
The difference is that Mozilla could make installing a H.264 decoder plug-in from some third party source on the first occasion the browser meets a H.264 video ridiculously easy if they chosen to. They did it with Flash, for example. But they've chosen not to.
- windsurfer 17y agoEr, Flash plays H.264. They've already done that.
- DrJokepu 17y agoYes, but this discussion was about H.264 support in the <video> tag.
- windsurfer 17y agoYes, and there exists javascript libraries and user agent hacks to fix that already. My point was that this isn't an engineering problem.