> I haven't dismissed the conclusions, just said I disagree with many of them. Earlier: > If they uncover anything, it is the very interesting political founda

> I haven't dismissed the conclusions, just said I disagree with many of them. Earlier: > If they uncover anything, it is the very interesting political foundations of a group of people That sounds like a classic dismissal to me. -- Anyway, not to get bogged down in a silly semantic argument. Who cares if it's real philosophy? I've tried reading Heidegger when I was young and naive. If that's real philosophy, I'll pass, thank you. If you have substantial, rigorous arguments against the existential risks posed by AI-based tech, I'd love to hear those, otherwise what you're saying sounds a lot more like an emotional and political reaction (presumably from the left end of the political spectrum).