3 ms·
What possibly happened (alternative version): "Shit, I don't think we can hit these performance targets and stay under the emissions limits." "Hmmmm... I thin
by jackgavigan 11y ago
What possibly happened (alternative version):
"Shit, I don't think we can hit these performance targets and stay under the emissions limits."
"Hmmmm... I think you're right."
"The boss is not going to be happy. I guess no bonus for us this year!"
"Hmmm... What if we wrote some code for the ECU to detect when the vehicle's being tested and dial down the performance?
"What, are you serious?"
"Yeah, that way it'll still meet the emissions standards, and hit the performance targets, right?"
"No way, man. Das ist verboten, dude. The boss'll never go for it!"
"He doesn't have to know! Nobody has to know. We just slip the code into the ECU when nobody's looking. Nobody's going to check it!"
"I dunno, man..."
"Come on! You want that bonus, don't you? Think of all the lederhosen you can buy!"
Paul Kedrosky wrote about this type of scenario: http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/an-engineering-theory-of-the-volkswagen-scandal http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/an-engineering-th...
- jacquesm 11y agoI've worked with quite a few German companies, none as large as VW but this is absolute SF (entertaining though it is). The Germans have a word for their way of working 'gruendlich' ('thorough') and they (usually!) mean it. How this happened will be the stuff of endless case studies when - and if - the truth will finally be on the table. At a guess that will not happen before all the current board members and the former CEO are well in their graves. BTW the whole scenario outlined in your link is bunk. The code came integral from Bosch and was definitely not developed gradually. It basically is designed purposefully to do an end-run around tests and Bosch explicitly warned against inclusion in the production version of the software saying 'this would be a very bad idea'.