3 ms·
> TLS's Mac-then-encrypt CBC was known not to be IND-CCA secure, and a few years later Thai Duong and Juliano Rizzo turned that property into BEAST. Then there
by ultramancool 11y ago
> TLS's Mac-then-encrypt CBC was known not to be IND-CCA secure, and a few years later Thai Duong and Juliano Rizzo turned that property into BEAST. Then there was CRIME, then Lucky13, and finally TLS MtE CBC had to be put to sleep.
One important thing to note however is that most (all?) of the TLS attacks rely on opening many thousands or millions of connections via scripting. Without this, these attacks would not be possible. A messaging system like telegram is not scriptable and hence, should not be exploitable in the same sorts of ways.
Of course, as you say, better solutions like Signal and OTR exist.
I'm really disappointed with the project management of Signal though, the shitstorm with F-Droid and Moxie's strange obsession with using 3rd party analytics software in privacy software, the fact they pulled socialist millionaires (zero knowlege proof based verifications) and left only automatic "let's trust the server" and QR code verification, the strong reliance upon phone numbers which still hasn't been broken even with the desktop release, etc... ChatSecure and similar might be a better option.
- tptacek 11y agoAre you here to discuss the cryptography of Telegram, or just to slag Signal?