3 ms·
"In the 1990s it became clear that microfinance, then the most exciting tool in development economics, was not reaching the very poorest people... BRAC came up
by panglott 11y ago
"In the 1990s it became clear that microfinance, then the most exciting tool in development economics, was not reaching the very poorest people... BRAC came up with a scheme to help the ultra-poor. It gives them a small stipend for food, followed by an asset such as a cow or a few goats, which they are expected to manage. Field workers visit weekly for the next two years, teaching recipients, for example, how to tell when a cow is in heat and how to get it inseminated. The aim is to help women 'graduate' from extreme poverty to the normal kind—as Sir Fazle puts it, 'to help them back into the mainstream of poor people'. ...A study published earlier this year in Science showed that similar programmes run by other NGOs boosted consumption in Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Pakistan and Peru, with the effects lasting at least a year after they ended. ...Such programmes are pricey. In India and Bangladesh they cost more than $1,000 per household at purchasing power parity. Other research explains why. ...The poorest women, it turned out, did far more hours of income-generating work...Yet they packed them into fewer days... The reason is that they toil mostly as domestic servants and in the fields—and casual agricultural work is seasonal. During planting and harvest they work extremely hard; the rest of the year they do little. Better-off women usually rear livestock, which is not only steady work but pays about twice as much per hour. When the poorest women are given cows, they quickly fill their idle time..."
- kelukelugames 11y agoMy family tried to do this in China. They donated a flock of sheep to a rural village. But they were tricked into paying high prices for an inferior breed. Keep in mind, my family is in China. So how do we help foreign countries without losing our donations to swindles?
- maxerickson 11y agoMonitoring for fraud and publicizing good and egregious bad actors probably goes a long way against swindlers. For example, these posts are critical of Heifer International: http://blog.givewell.org/category/heifer-international/ http://blog.givewell.org/category/heifer-international/ But they are mostly concerns about the whole concept of giving livestock, so it's probably still an effective strategy for someone that wants to give livestock to give money to Heifer International rather than trying to do anything more direct.
- rdancer 11y agoCharity always attracts scammers and swindlers. That's on them. It's OK, as long as you're not making the problem worse by financing "charities" that only further impoverish their clients either by malice or by incompetence. Suppose that rural village can put those inferior sheep to at least some use?
- dragonwriter 11y agoSame as avoiding swindles in any other use of money; research the specific options before committing resources and don't have blind faith in whoever is seeking your money.