3 ms·

I don't get why paleo diet is not congruent. So our DNA is build upon iterations(generations), and the aliments that were eaten in the majority of those are bet

• efaref 11y ago
  The "vast majority" of our ancestors were single cell beings.
  • hjura 11y ago
    Right, so including how close in time were those generations happening(compared to the actual one), then that diet would be still valid?
    • Retra 11y ago
      Valid for what? You have no obligation to eat what your ancestors ate. Our ancestors certainly didn't, which is why they didn't eat like single-celled organisms. If what you are thinking were true, it would be true for them as well. Not to mention the fact that your food has evolved as well.
      • hjura 11y ago
        I didn't say obligation. After reading here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091895/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091895/ My question was an oversimplification.