>which are neither historic, nor facts Your opinion, like his opinion might be too categorical and with too little argumentation. The way I perceived the feelin

>which are neither historic, nor facts Your opinion, like his opinion might be too categorical and with too little argumentation. The way I perceived the feelings of the eastern europe towards muslims (non-arabs, arabs and turks - very little differentiating between these sorts of muslims): "we don't hate them, but we strongly prefer not having muslim enclaves in our countries like they have in the western europe". Everybody in EE heard about the inconveniences experienced by france, belgium and netherlands due to their incapacity to assimilate the immigrants and no one in EE knows what are the advantages of immigration especially from third world countries. EE simply does not want to make the same immigration/multi-culti experiments that western europe made. There is little hate and no historic hate against muslims when it comes to accepting or rejecting these immigrants but if you think there is no historic hate towards turks in eastern europe, I think you don't search deep enough (it's right after the latent hate against russian domination, which is more recent).