> They seem very conservative in their claims. Hahaha! D-Wave's reputation is one of exaggeration and putting marketing before science. That's how Scott ended

> They seem very conservative in their claims. Hahaha! D-Wave's reputation is one of exaggeration and putting marketing before science. That's how Scott ended up as de-facto "chief D-Wave skeptic": he kept complaining about their exaggerations and the exaggerations of journalists covering them. (The paper being discussed now does actually seem conservative in its claims, but it's by a team at Google; not D-Wave.)