3 ms·
I'd think they meant the state going after them. Not everyone wants to be a carefree outlaw.
by rdancer 11y ago
I'd think they meant the state going after them. Not everyone wants to be a carefree outlaw.
- DominikR 11y agoI'm not an outlaw because I am ignorant of the laws and regulations of every single state on this planet. I put an app into the store that mainly follows Google/Apple policies/guidelines and does not break any laws in my country and that is sufficient for the start. These policies are reasonable and by following them you will rarely get into trouble in Western countries. Of course some other country might object, then the app might be modified by me for this country or removed. How many apps or website would exist today if checking every law everywhere would be the standard procedure? Probably around 100 websites and 25 apps in total would exist because only big corps can afford this.
- rdancer 11y agoIf you choose to sell your app in a particular App Store, you're submitting to the law of the jurisdiction it operates in.
- DominikR 11y agoNo I don't, Google and Apple do. They are distributing the app and are responsible that the content is compliant with all the countries where they sell apps in. Aside from that I don't understand what point you are trying to make here. Are you suggesting that a developer should not release apps without first making sure that the app doesn't comply with any laws of any country?
- marwann 11y agoIt's both about local laws and local accounting customs. They are so different depending on countries that you almost have to develop a separate system if you want to enter another country. Or you keep it so simple that the value added is close to none...