3 ms·
I've wondered if this can go the other way as well: e.g. "If Golbach's conjecture is true, then FTL signalling is possible. Since physics says FTL is impossibl
by stillsut 11y ago
I've wondered if this can go the other way as well:
e.g. "If Golbach's conjecture is true, then FTL signalling is possible. Since physics says FTL is impossible, then GC must be false"
[If you could reduce GC to a scheme for moving information via quantum entaglement. I use GC as an example because it is famous and an unproved, but maybe a better example is the Erdos Discrepancy [0] which makes statements about aritrarily long sequences in {1,-1} just like sampling quantum states!]
[0]: http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.05363 http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.05363
- NickM 11y agoI think most mathematicians would not accept something like that as a proof. Our understanding of physics is based on real-world observations and experiments in a way that math is not.