3 ms·
But by then they would've spent the money needed to update the game to a releasable game state plus any legal costs triggered by other parties "lawyering up," p
by gherkin0 11y ago
But by then they would've spent the money needed to update the game to a releasable game state plus any legal costs triggered by other parties "lawyering up," perhaps only to have the rug pulled out from under them.
- anigbrowl 11y agoThat's why you set up a separate entity to limit your liability first. Since the aim is to revive a game for its own sake rather than exploit it commercially, it doesn't matter if the entity in question goes bust.
- gherkin0 11y ago> That's why you set up a separate entity to limit your liability first. That may limit their liability, but it won't prevent them from losing their investment. > Since the aim is to revive a game for its own sake rather than exploit it commercially I think that's incorrect. I do not get the impression that Night Dive Studios exists as some kind of game preservation charity. It seems like a business that occupies a small niche around reviving old games to exploit them commercially.