4 ms·
For me, it's bloat. VS is slow as molasses and has a thousand features I don't need nor want. I also miss the multiselect feature from Sublime.
by wdmeldon 11y ago
For me, it's bloat. VS is slow as molasses and has a thousand features I don't need nor want. I also miss the multiselect feature from Sublime.
- jongalloway2 11y agoIf you want multiselect in Visual Studio, it's available via several extensions: https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/2beb9705-b568-45d1-8550-751e181e3aef https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/2beb9705-b568... http://www.hanselman.com/blog/SimultaneousEditingForVisualStudioWithTheFreeMultiEditExtension.aspx http://www.hanselman.com/blog/SimultaneousEditingForVisualSt... https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/f301cf82-e80b-4b92-9e5c-ef7985ae6702?SRC=Home https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/f301cf82-e80b...
- alkonaut 11y agoI think I'd rather go for VS.code then, than try to bend Emacs or Sublime into doing C#.
- bsuh 11y agoFor what it's worth, VS.code uses omnisharp-roslyn for its C# integration. So you can get a very similar experience from editors which have omnisharp-roslyn support.
- moonchrome 11y agoBut VS code has project support and debugging integration AFAIK. That's the kind of things that really set IDE vs editor in terms of usability.
- dasboth 11y agoInteresting, apart from longish compile times on big projects I've never had speed issues. Installing Resharper, useful as it is, made it crawl so I abandonded it, but I feel productive in VS on its own.