6 ms·
Certainly a horrible ad. But it is for buying a machine. If such ads were the culprit, women shouldn't be driving cars either? I don't know what the ads were li
by facepalm 11y ago
Certainly a horrible ad. But it is for buying a machine. If such ads were the culprit, women shouldn't be driving cars either? I don't know what the ads were like at the time, but I am pretty sure they made similar ads for cars. Also not sure what kind of ads were targeted at women. It's pretty common to this day, although cheap, to just mix a random product with the claim "will make you more attractive to the opposite sex".
Wasn't it also the case that at first operating computers was deemed a task for secretaries, and then the perception changed?
I suppose they could have shown ads of secretaries being loved by their bosses because they work so efficiently thanks to their shiny new computers.
Edit: http://www.macmothership.com/gallery/MiscAds/AdamAd.JPG http://www.macmothership.com/gallery/MiscAds/AdamAd.JPG - women should just have used Macs?
- Ygg2 11y agoCars != computers. Cars are a means of transportation and much more of a requirement to live in urban environment than a computer.
- ectoplasm 11y agoThere are quite a few massive cities in wealthy countries where a significant number of people choose not to drive even though they can afford it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._cities_with_most_households_without_a_car https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._cities_with_most_...