2 ms·

I'm not sure what you're getting at here.

• codexon 17y ago
  What I'm getting at here is that you are trying to be pedantic know-it-all, yet you fail to know the details of free speech which you claim to be so knowledgeable about. Just because I named 2 dubious uses of free speech, "slander" and "assasination", doesn't mean that the laws can't be twisted to clamp down on more legitimate issues: such as revealing corruption in the government which can be construed as libel in the US. Overall, I am disappointed in the attitude of HN readers like you who take freedom of speech lightly.