> If that is the case, and I were in your position, I would seriously consider moving elsewhere before I armed myself. Most people who live in those areas can'

> If that is the case, and I were in your position, I would seriously consider moving elsewhere before I armed myself. Most people who live in those areas can't really afford to do that. In any case, the onus is on the prohibitionist to defend the policy of prohibition, not the other way around. "Guns increased your chances of dying this year by 0.003%" (~11k gun homicides over 300M population) is a totally unmoving argument to me and I suspect most people in the US. At those risk levels, might as well ban cigarettes, motorcycles, aspirin, alcohol, leaving the house...