4 ms·
> It does not attempt to make sweeping statements about NoSQL or MySQL, nor does it prescribe a solution for every workload. The title is literally a sweeping
by jhall1468 11y ago
> It does not attempt to make sweeping statements about NoSQL or MySQL, nor does it prescribe a solution for every workload.
The title is literally a sweeping statement that MySQL is better. The first sentence in the introduction implies that the key-value store is an example of when MySQL is better.
Title: Scaling to 100M: MySQL is a Better NoSQL
First Sentence: MySQL is a better NoSQL. When considering a NoSQL use case, such as key/value storage, MySQL makes more sense in terms of performance, ease of use, and stability.
That's nothing if it isn't a sweeping statement.
- parent5446 11y agoThis is precisely why I asked if you read the article. But it seems you only read the title and the first sentence.
- jhall1468 11y agoI'm not who you responded to, but for the record I read the entire article. The reason I pointed out the title and first sentence, is because those were where the op made sweeping statements, which you claimed he didn't. A little defensive aren't we?