Using the author's standards, adding features to a language is always a good idea. > All well-written code is easy to read, and most poorly-written code is har

Using the author's standards, adding features to a language is always a good idea. > All well-written code is easy to read, and most poorly-written code is hard to read. Obviously Go can't change that. I completely disagree. Languages with lots of features can make poorly-written code vastly more difficult to read.