No, that's a false equivocation. It's not the fact that they were able to quit that makes the dangers not equivalent, it's the growing amount of unbiased resea

No, that's a false equivocation. It's not the fact that they were able to quit that makes the dangers not equivalent, it's the growing amount of unbiased research that shows that. Sane health care providers and policy experts tend to agree, as well, that harm-reduction is a much more attainable goal. Full on abstinence is routinely shown to be an untenable goal.