5 ms·
Why is that important? What might be important is whether the level of chemicals is high enough to pose a risk, not if something else is worse.
by m_eiman 11y ago
Why is that important? What might be important is whether the level of chemicals is high enough to pose a risk, not if something else is worse.
- kristofferR 11y agoBecause a lot of people are going to keep smoking cigarettes because ecigs "Cause lung cancer too".
- notlisted 11y agoI would say this context is important to weigh the dangers of analog vs digital. The 'popcorn lung' issue doesn't present itself with smokers of analog cigarettes, with higher concentrations of the same bad stuff, so why would anyone mention it in the context of digital cigarettes, unless it's scientific click-bait prepared for unscientific journalists looking for an article.
- frozenport 11y agoNot clear why you are being downvoted. Many people start smoking with e-cigs. These are people who otherwise wouldn't smoke.
- mistermann 11y ago> Many people start smoking with e-cigs Are you saying: Nothing > ecigs > regular cigarettes? If so, could you provide a citation for that claim?
- e1ven 11y agoI don't smoke - I never have. I've personally considered taking up ecigs on several occasions. I haven't done so because the ingredients in the fluid flavorings are so oddly unregulated - You end up with weird things which really aren't safe to be heated and inhaled. If I had confidence that there was sufficient oversight, such that they were only moderately dangerous, not "close our eyes, and hope for the best", I'd likely start using the devices.
- frozenport 11y agoYou do know that nicotine is addictive? Why would you take them up? My roommate did it a few times now he gets sick if he doesn't vape. The thing doesn't even vet you high! Its literally pure evil, there are much more interesting substances to use.
- p_eter_p 11y agoThis reads like an 80's anti drug commercial.
- warfangle 11y agoMany more people quit smoking with e-cigs. These are people who would otherwise contract lung cancer, COPD, or emphysema. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db217.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db217.pdf "About one in six current cigarette smokers (15.9%) and nearly one in four recent former cigarette smokers (22.0%) currently used e-cigarettes, compared with 2.3% of long-term former cigarette smokers and 0.4% of adults who had never smoked cigarettes"
- dogma1138 11y agoBecause bronchiolitis obliterans was never attributed to smoking before, and that diacetyl hasn't been actually studied as the cause of bronchiolitis obliterans before it the "popcorn lung" ordeal. The warning against diacetyl was issued by OSHA after several cases of bronchiolitis obliterans (and if we are completely frank then lawsuits which lead to some investigation) were attributed to working with artificial butter flavorings for microwave / easymake popcorn. Now the amount of cases was and still is negligible and while bronchiolitis obliterans on it self is extremely rare cases which can be tied even circumstantially to diacetyl are unicorns. Here is the entry for Wikipedia regarding the causes: Bronchiolitis obliterans has many possible causes, including: collagen vascular disease, transplant rejection in organ transplant patients, viral infection (respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, HIV, cytomegalovirus), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Pneumocystis pneumonia, drug reaction, aspiration and complications of prematurity (bronchopulmonary dysplasia), and exposure to toxic fumes, including: diacetyl, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ammonia, chlorine, thionyl chloride, methyl isocyanate, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen bromide, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen sulfide, phosgene, polyamide-amine dyes, mustard gas and ozone. It can also be present in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.[9] Certain orally administrated emergency medications, such as activated charcoal, have been known to cause it when aspirated. Additionally, the disorder may be idiopathic (without known cause). If you look at the amount of causes listed and the last sentence that states that the disorder may as well turn out to be idiopathic building a scare against E-Cig's is silly, no one knew about bronchiolitis obliterans until when in 2007 Wayne Watson who used to eat like 10 bags of popcorn a day sued and got 7M in damages and the media have picked the popcorn lung story and ran with it as well as uncovering a handful of cases dating from the early 2000's where OSHA changed the regulation regarding diacetyl requiring respirators and ventilation during processing. Now don't get me wrong diacetyl could cause or contribute to bronchiolitis obliterans or conditions that would allow the disorder to develop, but it could also be harmless or completely unrelated to the disorder, and even if is a cause so far all data we have points to the fact that it's extremely rare factor if one at all. This is what isn't being reported a proper report should read: "A study finds that diacetyl, a compound that might be linked to bronchiolitis obliterans is present in flavored E-Cig liquids Bronchiolitis obliterans also known as popcorn lung has been attributed to exposure to diacetyl during manufacturing of butter flavored microwave popcorn in a handful of cases in the United States. Diacetyl is also present in normal cigarettes in levels 50-100 times higher than the ones observed in E-Liquid. Smoking was never suspected as to have a direct to causal link to bronchiolitis obliterans as such while we advise some caution to be taken, there is no clear risk of bronchiolitis obliterans due to exposure to E-Cig vapor." But that report will not really catch any head lines so: "E-Cig's vapor will give you one of the rarest lung diseases" is used instead.