4 ms·
Like many ambitious wiki-based projects, this site seems to suffer from lack of focus. Look at these pages: http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Dendrochron
by g1n016399 11y ago
Like many ambitious wiki-based projects, this site seems to suffer from lack of focus. Look at these pages:
http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Dendrochronology http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Dendrochronology
http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Quantum_computer http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Quantum_computer
http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/TLD_.mobi http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/TLD_.mobi
http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Endianness http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Endianness
How is any of these things a file format? Because the definition of a file format in the FAQ (<http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/FAQ:File_Format> http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/FAQ:File_Format>) is so broad that it can be made to encompass basically everything. The manifesto that started this site is a rambling sermon that doesn't clarify anything in this respect: it just repeats "let's solve the problem" without even properly defining what the problem is.
There are also other issues. The classification scheme is often Procrustean and confused. Error messages were until recently mixed up with error detection codes, which conflates two different meanings of "error". Similarly FUSE shares a category with HFS+, even though the former is an API, and the latter a disk format; distinct things which just happen to share the name of "file system". The pages are rather short and consist mostly of lists of links. Given the above-mentioned lack of clearly defined scope, I suspect many pages seem to be created about topics just because they're in the news and/or just to have a place to put a link to a "neat" blog post: see for example <http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Facebook#Links> http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Facebook#Links>.
Last but not least, the whole site is rather ugly, and the logo is awfully non-descriptive of what it's supposed to contain; what am I supposed to do with this thumb, stick it up my arse?
It's a shame, really, because documenting file formats is a hard and valuable endeavour. But I don't think these people are going to do a good job of it.
- TillE 11y agoEndianness is extremely relevant to file formats. The others certainly seem like irrelevant nonsense; "organic file formats"?
- db48x 11y agoArchive Team is backing up DNA, just in case.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- TuringTest 11y agoLooking at the "what links here" page, the "quantum computer" is probably there as a stop-gap definition because the term is used at "Quantum compressed archive".[1] Any successful wiki will have a problem of demarcation; the initial signs being that people add whatever they want, including ramblings like Two cows. [2] If the project goes along, taking Wikipedia as precedent there will develop two "inclusionist" and "deletionist" cultures that will fight over the definition of what the project should cover, but which would get rid of these extreme cases. [1] http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Quantum_compressed_archive http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Quantum_compressed_a... [2] http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Two_cows http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Two_cows
- textfiles 11y agoExcept from the very first day, the declared final authority falls at my desk, and I am a hardcore inclusionist. So no, it won't be making that mistake.