I disagree with calling the statement tautology. On the contrary. Imagine a scenario where 99 people own 1$ each and 1 person own 10$. The richest person does n

I disagree with calling the statement tautology. On the contrary. Imagine a scenario where 99 people own 1$ each and 1 person own 10$. The richest person does not own nowhere near majority of the wealth. This is how OP understood the situation, while the current situation is more like 99 people owning 1$each while 1 person owns 110$. Do you see my point?