We actually do need to talk about those feedback loops. Really. In science that is extremely important, we probably don't disagree. This is obvious. For layme

We actually do need to talk about those feedback loops. Really. In science that is extremely important, we probably don't disagree. This is obvious. For laymen who vote about this shit and need to be informed? Again important. If we just wave around this "99% of scientist" shit, the intelligent, but uninformed part of populace is not going to buy it. They feel like being called idiots. There is nothing like that to make a person to vehemently oppose you, if he has based part of his ego on being intelligent. Now in my circle of friends, who am I going to believe on this subject. The guy who goes "420 blaze it! 99% of scientist agree cars are bad!" Or the guy who is bachelor of something and is really really skeptical about all this climate change stuff. I would go with the latter. The message should be "We hear you and we aren't 100% certain. Let's start from the easy stuff to minimize the potential bad stuff."