> I chose my words carefully. What, precisely, did gwern do? Describe their actions as if your Reddit link didn't exist. I also chose my words carefully. I poi

> I chose my words carefully. What, precisely, did gwern do? Describe their actions as if your Reddit link didn't exist. I also chose my words carefully. I pointed out that he was involved in making this accusation. He used faulty reasoning from poor misevidence to draw a conclusion that can bring tremendous harm to others. Article states his involvement, plus private correspondence of ~30 days of work on this article, plus I have known him for years and we talk about Satoshi speculation a bunch thus how I know that he has actually looked at the misevidence. I suppose the other issue is that he's from the "lesswrong" community which claims to be better at reasoning, but the only kind of reasoning that would be complicit with glossing over such substantially useless "evidence" is ... motivated reasoning. > Perhaps what's going on here is that bitcoin enthusiasts are upset that Satoshi may have been identified. Nah, I am just as curious as anyone else. I also know that finding Satoshi 4realz is going to bring tremendous danger to whoever that person was.