4 ms·
> We cannot know what his original view on climate change might have been. Does it matter? You don't have the right to demand that everyone agree with you, ev
by fredkbloggs 11y ago
> We cannot know what his original view on climate change might have been.
Does it matter? You don't have the right to demand that everyone agree with you, even if you're right. We don't burn people at the stake or try to silence them for disagreement. Please stop trying to create unanimity; it's not healthy.
What we should punish people for: lying to Congress, taking or offering bribes, doing dishonest work while in the public employ. All of those apply, and any should be sufficient, at a bare minimum, to justify firing these professors. However, thinking that climate change doesn't exist or isn't anthropogenic is not a crime. Saying so is not a crime, either. And I'm damned glad of it!
- kijin 11y agoI don't think you disagree with me. Of course people have every right to deny climate change or whatever else they want to deny. His original view, if there ever was such a thing, still matters because many of us would like to know whether he changed his views after accepting the bribe. It doesn't matter if he changed his views from right to wrong or the other way around, what matters is that a scientist might have changed his public views based on something other than evidence.
- knughit 11y agoWhat makes you think he has a to change? One of them was a sociologist, not a climate scientist or economist.