That Twitter is employing 6,000 people is a mystery to me. That's what we get with that many employees: Instead of becoming as sturdy and reliable as an API and

That Twitter is employing 6,000 people is a mystery to me. That's what we get with that many employees: Instead of becoming as sturdy and reliable as an API and a protocol, there's always several subgroups who aren't submerged by day-to-day work and who end up proposing a disruptive change. After much fighting, one of them wins. The other way is Snapchat: 1-2 employees, probably lots of profits, period.