3 ms·
Nice. Two calm comments of mine, both down voted to 0 or lower. ...and yet someone making no points and calling names (below) still has a positive score. You
by tjic 17y ago
Nice.
Two calm comments of mine, both down voted to 0 or lower.
...and yet someone making no points and calling names (below) still has a positive score.
You down voters ought to be ashamed of yourselves - this is a marketplace of IDEAS, and yet you're just lashing out. Very mature. Very much in the spirit of HN.
- noodle 17y agocan you point out in the article, with quotes, where your ideas are validated? i read the article first, read your comment, and then re-read the article and nowhere do i see any support for your summary. the only thing i can imagine is that this article doesn't line up with your own personal belief system, and you're violently rejecting it.
- KWD 17y agoRe-read your comment, and I don't think you can really classify it as 'calm'. It clearly shows your political motivation, the same as you accuse the author.
- mquander 17y agoYour comments are not calm, they are flamebait; and your opinions don't appear to have any connection to the actual article, in which the author describes specific reasons why he thought the Journal's coverage was poor (e.g. their failure to distinguish between financial and commodity markets, their failure to mention China's announcement.)