3 ms·
If Satoshi is Wright, and he really wanted to remain nameless, he almost certainly would not have shown up to the Bitcoin Investor’s Conference. Poor op-sec. T
by wityak 11y ago
If Satoshi is Wright, and he really wanted to remain nameless, he almost certainly would not have shown up to the Bitcoin Investor’s Conference. Poor op-sec.
That said, the issue with outing him is that he could hold more sway over the direction of BTC than if it were a truly decentralized currency. Not sure this if that's in the best interests of BTC.
- symlinkk 11y agoJudging by the trainwreck that the debate over the change in block size ended up being, maybe Bitcoin could use a benevolent dictator.
- sneak 11y agoIt wasn't a trainwreck; it worked exactly as it should. Bitcoin is not a system for those that favor changing the rules once the game is in play.
- reddytowns 11y agoIt isn't a system where large mining corporations are supposed to have a hangman's noose around it, either.
- DennisP 11y agoBitcoin has gone through lots of changes. For example, the blocksize limit was added in July 2010, a year and a half after launch.