5 ms·
TWC coverage is not bad - my addresses in LA each have had 300Mbps available for $65/mo. Speed tests clock in around 330Mbps down.
by hughes 11y ago
TWC coverage is not bad - my addresses in LA each have had 300Mbps available for $65/mo. Speed tests clock in around 330Mbps down.
- ceejayoz 11y agoTWC coverage here in Rochester, NY is $84/month for 50Mbps. I'd guess you only get 6x the speed for less money in LA in places where fiber is a viable competitor.
- tomkinstinch 11y agoI have gigabit fiber at my house in Rochester for $100/month via the new upstart ISP, Greenlight (actually their lower 500Mbps tier for $75/mo). They're expanding slowly, but they are expanding.
- ceejayoz 11y agoI'm drooling over Greenlight. Thus far they seem to be prioritizing high-density areas like apartment complexes, though. Down in Pittsford it's not looking hopeful for a few years at least.
- joshavant 11y agoAs a recent LA transplant from SF, I found it ironic that TWC offers such a fast, affordable internet service, yet SF - arguably the modern global hub of tech - struggles with slow, expensive internet, almost throughout. As a tech worker, this is easily one of the better LA v. SF advantages.